Casino online games lose out to the real world

In many ways, the US has the best and the worst system of federal and state governments in the world. Arguably it has the qualities of being the best because, even though it's a two-horse race, there's enough of a difference between the political intentions of the successful candidates to make life interesting. But it's one of the worst because of the level of corruption in the lawmaking following elections. Money speaks loud behind the scenes with different lobbying groups pressuring the elected representatives to deliver on the promises they made to get the campaign funds. For these purposes, it makes no difference which party you look at. All the individuals at every level in the political system depend on "donations" to get elected. When it comes to the world of gambling, the politics get particularly complicated.

For individual states, the revenue derived from the different forms of licensed gambling helps avoid complete financial meltdown. Yes, there's a recession, but this has only slowed the flow of money into gambling. Unlike other sources of tax revenue, the gamblers of America are helping balance budgets. But there are different interested parties. In one corner stand the real world casino operators who want the least possible regulation on their activities. Their group is not united because the casinos on Indian land have advantages and, some say, represent unfair competition. We should not forget the other sites who can get licences to run slots. In another corner stand the racing interests. They are long-standing political players and also want the maximum freedom to run their own betting operations with the least interference from states. This blurs into another group that runs betting operations on other sporting events. While a more distant group runs online casinos.

As an example of the conflict of interests, let's go to Massachusetts where there's a new bill in the state House to establish two new real world casinos. As always, the declared intention is to generate more revenue for the state. To maintain a monopoly for the land-based casino operations, the bill proposes to criminalize all online gambling. It will be an offense for any resident of Massachusetts to place or accept a wager placed by a telecommunication device, no matter where they may be located. You will realize, of course, this includes all telephone betting and would hit the racing and sports betting operations. Not surprisingly, this has stirred up an intense lobbying exercise.

Real world operations are preferred because they are easier to police and monitor when it comes to collecting the tax or levy. Once operations disappear down telephone lines or into the internet, they can be based anywhere. This seriously complicates the collection of any tax. States like to keep their worlds simple. They want the maximum revenue from licensed gambling with the lowest possible cost for collection. Just crossing state lines makes collection more difficult. If casino games are offered from outside US territory, tax cannot be collected. That's one of the reasons why the federal government clamped down on the use of credit cards and other easy payment methods. It forced more operations onshore where they could be taxed. Whether you agree with this approach to balancing the budgets is irrelevant. Casino games are seen as the easy way to raise money without upsetting the electorate. Imagine a world without gambling and hear the roar of anger if states announced an increase in sales tax.

Get cheap home insurance despite the premium hikes

As with every group of businesses, there's an association for the insurance industry. It's called the Insurance Information Institute. When individual insurers fear adverse publicity, the III usually gets the job of making general announcements. That way, the news comes out with less damage to the member companies. So, for example, when there was flooding because of the melting snow and then the torrential rains, it was left to the III to warn people that the majority of policies do not cover damage caused when sewers back up. That's not the most reassuring of news. Making equally bad reading was a report that premium rates for property insurance were likely to rise by an average of 3% this year. This reflects both the aforementioned bad weather and the rise in the costs of repairs. You might not have noticed it yet, but builders have been steadily increasing their charges. The price of gas has been rising, labor costs are up, replacement materials are more expensive - it's all bad news even though there's supposed to be a recession.

So why might you have a heart attack when your renewal notice hits the mailbox? Although the politicians may not have accepted the reality of climate change, the insurance industry is watching the statistics and reassessing weather risks state-by-state. There's been tornadoes and major storms across the southern states. Their premiums will be rising faster. The other common reason flows from the insistence that you all shop around for your next policy. In the days of habit, you picked an insurer and bundled your auto and home policies. This earned you a discount and everyone was happy. As more people use internet search engines to find the cheapest auto insurance, they are breaking the bundle and the rate for the remaining home policy goes up sharply. You should always look at all your policies together and not deal with separate policies.

How to keep premium rate increases to a minimum? First remember CLUE. The Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange is another insurance industry body that stores information about every claim you make. If you propose changing insurers, the first thing new companies check before giving you a quote is whether you have recently made a claim. If so, you will be quoted a higher premium. The moral of this story is not to claim unless you are looking at a really big loss. Then there's the recession and its effect on your credit score. Most insurers include the score in their formula to decide whether you are a responsible person. The assumption is that people with good credit records will also take care of their homes. Before you start shopping around, do whatever you can to improve your score. For useful advice, try www.myfico.com and www.whatsmyscore.org.

In other words, no matter how great the temptation to track down cheap homeowners insurance using the internet, think carefully about bundles, the claims you have made, and your credit score. These are factors under your control and, unlike blindly increasing your deductible which is you deciding to insure yourself, will produce long-term savings on your homeowners insurance quotes. Remember, it's better to get quality homeowners insurance at an affordable price than cut-price insurance that fails to cover you when your sewers dump their contents in your kitchen.